Hallucinations
LLMs confidently generate false information based on training patterns.
Citing non-existent research papers or making up statistics.
Guide 01 — Fundamentals
Retrieval-Augmented Generation combines a large language model with retrieval from your own documents, so answers are grounded in real sources instead of the model's memory.
01 — The problem
LLMs confidently generate false information based on training patterns.
Citing non-existent research papers or making up statistics.
LLM training has a cutoff date, missing recent information.
Unable to answer questions about events after training.
There is no way to trace where information came from.
Users have no way to verify claims made by the model.
02 — The core insight
Instead of relying only on what an LLM learned during training, RAG retrieves relevant passages from your own documents and hands them to the model as context for its answer.
That grounds responses in actual data, reduces hallucination, and opens up private or recent information the model never saw.
# Pseudocode
def rag_query(question, documents):
# 1. Find relevant context
context = retrieve(question, documents)
# 2. Augment the prompt with context
prompt = build_prompt(question, context)
# 3. Generate a grounded answer
return llm(prompt)03 — Step by step
Documents are loaded and split into smaller chunks for processing.
Each chunk is converted into a vector embedding.
Embeddings are stored in a vector database for fast retrieval.
User questions are embedded using the same model.
Most similar document chunks are retrieved from the vector store.
The LLM generates an answer using the retrieved context.
04 — In production
Explore the architecture step by step, or skip ahead and try the pipeline on your own document.